Layout flaw in Guestbook 5.0.0 ?
Posted: 05 Jan 2025, 19:37
Goodday Phoca Team,
I have migrated GuestBook from J3 to J4 without problems and stepped up to Guestbook 4.0.4 to 5.0.0 afterwards.
Now i notice a small difference in the layout of the guestbook posts between the GB3 and GB4/5 version.
Where in the 3 version the posts are separated by thin lines and the posting date is added under the post text in the 4/5 version the post date (seems to be) added above the post text now. But this date is actually the date of newer above it. So it appears that the separating lines have shifted one element up catching the post date of the newer post a if it is the post date of the actual post between the lines....
As you can see In the second image the post date seems to be the 24th of january but the correct date is the 17th november.
https://www.omroepzendermuseum.nl/image ... -01-05.png
https://www.omroepzendermuseum.nl/image ... -01-05.png
I did install Guestbook 5.0.0 on Joomla 4.4.9 with Cassiopeia template.
Can this be a flaw in Guestbook ?
Regards,
Bernard.
I have migrated GuestBook from J3 to J4 without problems and stepped up to Guestbook 4.0.4 to 5.0.0 afterwards.
Now i notice a small difference in the layout of the guestbook posts between the GB3 and GB4/5 version.
Where in the 3 version the posts are separated by thin lines and the posting date is added under the post text in the 4/5 version the post date (seems to be) added above the post text now. But this date is actually the date of newer above it. So it appears that the separating lines have shifted one element up catching the post date of the newer post a if it is the post date of the actual post between the lines....
As you can see In the second image the post date seems to be the 24th of january but the correct date is the 17th november.
https://www.omroepzendermuseum.nl/image ... -01-05.png
https://www.omroepzendermuseum.nl/image ... -01-05.png
I did install Guestbook 5.0.0 on Joomla 4.4.9 with Cassiopeia template.
Can this be a flaw in Guestbook ?
Regards,
Bernard.